FUNdoing - Activities for Team Builders
  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Books
  • Trainings
  • Ricochet
  • Contact
  • Store

Let's Talk About: Generational Issues/Awareness

10/6/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture

John, one of our fellow FUN Followers, wrote into me asking about my experience with groups (clients) interested in exploring "generational issues/awareness." I thought this would be and interesting conversation to share and see if others might have something to contribute. Here's John's initial inquiry: 
John: ​I was wondering if you have come across/created any activities for groups that were interested in exploring generational issues/awareness?

I wonder about dividing groups by generation (if they have a good mix) and getting them to do the same activity and compare differences on process? Conversations/panels between generations with the right questions would be fruitful too. Thoughts?
After some consideration, here's what I shared with John:
Chris: ​You pose an interesting question. I don't know any activities specific to "generational issues/awareness" and have yet to create/develop anything specific myself. 

My question back to you is, What problem are you wanting to solve with such activities? (I have a pretty good idea, but I'm interested in your answer.) 

I've had a number of clients over the past year that have expressed concern over the dynamics between the "older" and "newer" (i.e., younger) employees. When I worked with them we explored the behaviors (things seen and heard) that surfaced through the program activities - Which behaviors were working for them and which ones where not?. Then, it was all about deciding what the group wanted to keep doing and what they wanted to change (or start doing). Some behaviors (good or bad) did relate to different ways of thinking, which could have been attributed to generational issues - but is that the REAL issue? 

In my mind it's all about diversity. This is a BIG word in the workplace and in educational settings across the world as of late. Age gaps (that might include different ways of thinking, acting and being) are simply diverse groups of people challenged to find ways to work together.

Thoughts? 
John continues the thread: 
John: Thanks for your reply. I am surprised that there are not many/any generational activities out there!

I am not trying to solve any problem per se. I look at generational stuff as a generational intelligence like emotional intelligence with 4 categories:

1. self awareness
2. self management
3. social awareness
4. social management

I would like to raise [generational] intelligence,

A lot of clients have been talking and asking about generational training. And I have been scratching my head and am curious. 

Is all this generational stuff just different behaviors as you mentioned? Is it different cultural dimensions? Is it a hoax? Or is it more?

My leaning is toward more. I get to work with groups (7th graders, MBA students, etc.) now over decades. I am getting older and they remain the same age. So it could be me being different/older but I see a difference in these groups. For one, they all seem nicer. And less strategic. And they jump to a solution...I call this firing...and they keep on firing without any sense of ready or aim (their world is one of velocity). They also do not seem strategically interested in going in a straight line from A to B and would rather go out in some tangential direction away from B but thinking that it still leads to B (don't know if I am clear here?). Do you see any of this?

So I am big on raising awareness and managing that new awareness for a different result.

I was recently taught 2 new words. Ethnocentric (believing that your way is the only way or the best way) and ethnorelative (believing that there are many ways/thoughts/cultural preferences which are different than yours yet valid and important for you to master also to be a great leader). This has changed my thinking immensely. My awareness and management of self and others has shifted because of this. I have moved away from binary thinking to dialetic (AND)...that multiple ways are both/all  right. I would like to look into generational issues with the same light. 

I am not a researcher [but] like to test things and gain data right away. Which ties into the experiential activity field we are in.

Why not divide groups by generations and see how they solve problems/think? Is there any correlation to generations?

The messy part is that sociologists pick the dates of generations and they do not agree to dates exactly. And there is [the] middle of the generation as well as at the beginning or at the end which would affect people differently.

People from different generations seem to look at each other as if they were aliens. Nanu nanu! How to shine light here?

I hope this answers some of your questions about my interest in generations.

​Thoughts?
Instead of replying to John's last email, I wanted to save my thoughts for this blog post. 

It just so happens that (based on a recent recommendation from Michael Cardus) I started reading the book, Helping: How to Offer, Give, and Receive Help (2009) by Edgar Schein. So far it's been an engaging read since I can correlate a lot of the teambuilding I do directly to helping behaviors. Here are a few points from the first two sections of the book that, I believe, can relate to our generational issues/awareness discussion: 
  • Helping is a fundamental human relationship...[it] is a basic relationship that moves things forward. (Preface). [Note: cites are from a Kindle reader app in portrait mode on an iPad 2.]
  • All relationships are governed by cultural rules that tell us how to behave in relation to each other...in any given culture there will be a set of universal rules that, if violated, cause the person to be ostracized or isolated (p. 8)
  • "Social economics" is part of cultural relationships - it involves the "face" that we build, the reputation we have (or think we have and deserve), and our interactions with others. If the rules of social economics are violated [possibly because the rules are not understood across cultures and generations] then friction occurs. [This point can be linked to "norming" in group development or "Full Value Contracts" we develop with groups.] (pp. 11-13)
The details of social economics continues, but stopping here coincides with our discussion. This concept (or social theory) struck a cord with me in relation to John's generational issues/awareness thinking. Let's consider a group of multi-generational participants (e.g., co-workers). If one generation thinks ethnocentrically and the other thinks ethnorelatively the communication between the generations may not  mesh with the social economics expectations of each generation thus causing friction. 
I'm sure it's also possible for two different generations within a group to be the same types of thinkers. What if they both had an ethnocentric point of view - each thought their way was the best way. How do you work with that situation? What if both generations were ethnorelative thinkers? Maybe there's no problems? The question arises then, how do we know what thinkers we're working with? (Also, don't discount the fact that there could be more than two different "generations" within one working group, as John noted, in relation to the "messy part" about dating generations.) 
You can see we could really keep going down the rabbit hole here. But let's take a team breadth. There are other great conversations just like this one that circle around the adventure education field. They give some of us cause for reflection (and program development possibilities). However, my mindset tends to settle back into the "every day" team building facilitators out there. How can this conversation help them?
In my (humble) opinion, it doesn't help them at all until they are ready to add to the conversation.. Which means they have some experience with the issue(s) in the conversation and believe they can use the information to help them in the future. In John's case, he was ready. He brought up the questions. He wants to know what's out there. 
If you want to keep going down the rabbit hole with John and me, leave a comment for us below. Do you run into situations involving generational issues/awareness? How do you approach these issues? What activities do you lead in order to flush out these issues? We're ready to keep it going.  
What can you take from this if you're more interested in climbing out of the hole for now? When working with groups that you know include multiple generations, continue planning educative experiences (programs) that allow the groups to recognize and explore behaviors (things they can see and hear) that help them move towards their goals, and recognize and explore those behaviors that keep them from their goals. Then, find out which behaviors they want to keep using and which behaviors they want to change or stop using? Personally, I do not make it about generational issues (even though some may identify them as such), it's about what help's them achieve their desired outcomes.  

​All the best, 

Chris Cavert, Ed.D. (and John)
0 Comments

Let's Talk About: Name Games

5/2/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture

This post was inspired by my new friend and adventure educator (and FUN Follower) Katie. Her situation is a common tale - she wants something different.  

In a recent email she told me: 
My favorite name game is Group Juggle because it seems to be the most helpful in actually learning names. But, after you facilitate it for the hundredth time it's time for something different. ​
Then she asked, 
Do you know of any [other name games] that are as helpful and active as Group Juggle that work with youth and adults?

In my response to Katie (along with some suggested Name Games) I said that I know "Name Games" in two ways. Activities that use names as a helpful behavior within a task, and activities that are used to learn and practice names. When names are used as a helpful behavior the task is the focus (e.g., Group Juggle - get the object through the pattern as quickly as you can). Learning names is not the goal, but again, it's helpful to the task, and yes, some participants might actually learn some names 
I also told Katie that if the facilitator actually takes the time after an activity (like Group Juggle) to go around and ask for volunteers to call out as many names as they can, then we're practicing and learning names (and offering a "challenge" as well). A win-win in my book. (But, in my experience, I don't see this happening very much with activities that use names - it might not be necessary or it simply might not seem important enough. Learning names important enough - don't get me started.)
Activities that are used to learn and practice names are different. The goal is to learn names, any other outcomes are secondary. Below is one of my all-time favorite Name Games. It's purpose is to learn names in a fun way. Here's how I facilitate it: 
Toss-a-Name Game & Testing Out Toss-a-Name Game comes from the first edition of Silver Bullets (Rohnke, 1984). You need a bunch a safe tossable objects (safe enough to hit the cranial regions without damage - not that we're doing this on purpose!) for your circle of players - I have at least one tossable for every two people. 
One object starts the action. The person tossing the object is asked to first, 1) say the name of the person s/he is tossing the object to, then 2) make a connection with this person - in many cultures this is eye-contact, finally 3) toss the object. This is called "Proper Tossing Procedure" (or PTP). Following this procedure leads most groups to successful tosses and catches (not that catching is even required). The next person to possess the object (since the intended person might not get the toss) follows the same procedure - name, connection, toss. This one object goes around the group in any which-way - no pattern required. Once the process is understood, after a minute or so, I stop the action and tell my group about Testing Out. 
Now that you understand how PTP works I would like to give you a challenge - remember, it's your challenge, your choice around here, so it's up to you if you want to try "testing out." We're going to continue the activity, following PTP. After a few minutes I will stop the process and ask who would like to test out. If you are up for the challenge, the first thing you will need to tell me is what grade you want to go for - this means, getting 90% or more names correct gives you an "A" grade. (For an A+ you need to get all the names correct.) A "B" is in the 80th percents, a "C" is in the 70th percents, and so on. If you don't get the grade you want, you can try again after another round of tossing play. 
Adding the "test" challenge has been a great success for me. Even though there is no real grade given (nothing is written down), the "grade" motivates the learning process and influences (most) participants to focus on practicing names as they toss objects around the group (and noticing other names when they are not tossing anything). If a person doesn't know someone's name they can ask, "Hey, you in the red shirt, please help me out. What is your name?" Once a name is given, then it's practice time - name, connection, toss. 
Now, something else is happening in Toss-a-Name Game. More objects are being added to the process when the facilitator feels the group can handle more - all following PTP. All the flying about creates a little anxiety and fun (now you get the cranial reference) while the learning is going on.
After every couple of minutes I'll stop the action and ask if anyone wants to test out. ​In the beginning I might simply ask, Who thinks they have 50% of the names? Maybe 70%? How about 80%? (You get to see if there is some learning going on.) Okay, who's willing to try the test? I'll take two or three volunteers. I ask for the grade they want then let them have at it. We all celebrate their attempt, whether it was a success in their eyes or not - because they can try again another time. One of the secondary goals of this process is to show the group how you are creating a safe learning environment - if you take a "risk" we will support you. With that said, I am always one of the first to "test," and I usually have to try a few times before I get my A+. (I show my group I'm willing to take the risk as well - and willing to "fail" and learn from the process.)
Now, you might be thinking, "Testing is the outcome Chris! I thought you said learning names was the outcome?" Again, I see testing as the motivator - something of choice is on the line. Each person chooses her/his own grade (goal) if s/he even wants to test out, does their best, and celebrates the attempt knowing they gave it a shot. Often times just like the activities coming up in the program. There will be some risk involved, but if you support each other and take a shot, you will find success. All this from a Name Game. 
Katie, thanks for letting me share your question. If any of you out there want to share your favorite Name Game, leave us (Katie and me) a comment below. Thanks! 

Have FUN out there!

Chris Cavert
0 Comments
    Assets Package is Now Available 
    Picture
    Assets Package
    Picture
    Processing for Beginners
    FREE Mini-Course

    Click for Information
    Some Team Building Tools at the STORE! 
    Picture
    Details & Purchase
    Picture
    Details & Purchase
    Picture
    Details & Purchase

    JOIN
    FUNdoing
    Fridays
    Team Building Activities sent to your email every two weeks! 
    Picture
    FREE Processing Activity just for signing up! 

    Blog Author

    Dr. Chris Cavert is an internationally known author, speaker, and trainer in the area of adventure-based activity programming and its relation to community and pro-social behavior development.

    Blog Purpose

    This blog is a space for hands-on programable fun - energetic activities and ideas that can be used as a means to bring people together; activities and ideas we as educators can add to our social development curriculums. 

    Categories

    All
    Activities
    A Files
    A-Files
    Challenge Course
    Chiji Cards
    Ed Tech 4 Adv Ed
    Facilitation
    Fun Props
    Lessons
    Let's Talk About
    List Play
    Noodles
    On Pedagogy
    Print N Play
    Processing
    Programming
    Puzzles
    Read This
    Repurposed
    Resources
    Tools For Team Builders
    Top 10 Activities
    Variations
    Videos
    What? & Why?

    Archives

    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly