FUNdoing - Activities for Team Builders
  • FUNdoing
  • About
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Books
  • Trainings
  • Ricochet
  • Contact
  • Store

Tipping Towers (video)

5/14/2026

0 Comments

 
Note from Chris: This video is over 6 minutes. I kept in more content in this one so you could listen to the verbal communication of this team in action. They made the journey look easy with a good dose of task focus and thoughtful communication. 

I've been a fan of the 3D Bull Ring Tube. However, I've also been wanting to figure out how to get the people on the bottom strings of the tube more engaged – the strings at the top of the traditional version do more of the work. 

This new design hit me recently. The 'top' strings are places just below the center of the 10-inch tube (1.5-inch diameter tube). Now, the bottom strings need to provide the leverage for the ball to stay on top of the tube.  

The Objective: Get the tennis ball, that starts out on top of the 'Wide' tower, on top of the 'Narrow' tower (1-inch tube with couplings at each end). 

Needs & Numbers: One set of Tipping Towers (two towers per set) plays well with 6 to 12 participants. (You can find the three-pack set at Training Wheels, enough strings for 36 people.)  

Process: Set down the Wide Tower (with the strings spread out away from the tower) on the floor about 12 feet from the Narrow tower that is set standing on the floor. 

Rules:​
  • All strings must be held at the knot located at the end of each string.
  • Once the Wide Tower is off the ground, strings may not touch the ground until after the ball is successfully placed on top of the Narrow Tower.
  • For safety reasons, strings may not be wrapped or folder around anything.
  • The ball may only be touched by the Wide Tower and the Narrow Tower.
  • Towers may not be touched by participants in any way.
  • If the ball falls off either Tower, a restart is required.  

 
Possible Reflection Questions:
  • What was your first impression of the activity after hearing about it? Did your impression change after starting? It what way? How is this like meeting new people?
  • Let’s think about and discuss the activity in three parts. 1) Describe what you remember about starting the challenge – picking the Wide Tower up off the ground. What worked well, what didn’t? 2) Describe the portion of the challenge where you were moving the Wide Tower towards the Narrow Tower. What worked well for you and what didn’t? 3) Describe the final part of the challenge – placing the Wide Tower down over the Narrow Tower. What worked well for you as a team and what didn’t?
  • What emotions surfaced for you during the challenge? How did these emotions influence the way you participated in the experience?
  • In your opinion, what is the best thing you did as a team during the challenge?
  • In your opinion, what is one thing you believe your team can do better when it comes to working together?

With a simple change, the next level of challenge is achieved. It's been fun to watch and valuable to learn from. 

So far we've tried it starting at floor level and tabletop level. The tabletop start and finish seem to be easier – the standing and squatting start and end from the floor involve more dynamic movements which have dislodged the ball more frequently. 

I hope you get the opportunity to try it out.

All the best,

Chris Cavert, Ed.D.   
0 Comments

Tabletop Blind Mouse Maze

4/27/2026

0 Comments

 
My friend West and I led a workshop that included this tabletop mouse maze. It was super exciting with rich takeaways (see the Reflection Questions below). We used 6-foot round tables and divided the surface in quarters using blue painters tape (easier to remove at the end). Each quarter included a zig-zag maze (outlined with blue tape), three 'cat' stickers, two victor mouse traps, and an oversized yellow die – the cheese. 
Picture
Below is a close up of the Traps and Cheese. We were working with adults so we chose to place the loaded mousetraps close to the cheese. The traps can be placed further away to reduce some stress if needed. We use oversized foam dice (because we had them) for the prize. The elevation made the perch higher than the traps to mitigate some of the perceived and actual risk. If you don't have the dice you could cut up some 1.5- x 1.5-inch dowel rods or or pvc for perches. The cat stickers we found at a craft store (e.g., Michael's) and the soft mice at a pet store.  
Picture
The Objective: Slide the mouse through the maze unsighted, avoiding the walls, cats and traps and place it on top of the cheese in the center of the table. 

Each quarter of the table was used by a pair. One person was sighted, one person had their eyes closed. The person with their eyes closed was guided by their partner through the maze, avoiding the walls (blue tape) and the cats (stickers). The mouse is slid along the table until it reaches the entrance to the traps area. Then, using detailed verbal communication, the sighted partner directs their blind partner to pick up and put the mouse on top of the cheese. 

If the mouse were to fall into the trap area, without setting off a trap, the sighted partner can continue to provide directions for the safe removal of the mouse by their unsighted partner. And ultimately make a successful perch of the mouse onto the cheese. 

After a maze trip, partners talk to each other about the experience, sharing what went well and what could have made the experience better. Then, partners switch roles. 

TRAP WARNING: Yes, loaded mousetraps provide a heightened level of risk - use this activity with groups that exhibit good verbal communication skills. If you know how to use mousetrap activities within a teambuilding program, you could do a warm up experiences like the Mousetrap Trust Sequence (see the book Raptor, by Sam Sikes). 

Possible Reflection Questions:
  • What were some of the concerns you and your partner had with the maze before the mouse started moving? What did you discuss and address about the concerns before starting? 
  • What was important about the plan you had with your partner before starting? What were some of the specifics you included in your plan? Why were these specifics important? 
  • What were the hazards you needed to plan for? What hazards in your day-to-day life do you need to plan for? 
  • What concerns did you have about the loaded mouse traps? How did you address your concerns? What sort of traps are you around in your day-to-day lives? What are some of the ways you address these traps? 
  • If a trap was set off during the experience, how did it influence your future actions? 
  • How was trust related to this experience? What behaviors did your partner exhibit to build trust? What behaviors did you experience that did not build trust? 
  • What lessons can we take away from this experience? 

I hope you have the opportunity to try this one. We spent about 30 minutes with it the first time we tried. It was about 10 minutes with the frontload, 20 minutes for the activity (moving the mouse), and about 10 to ask questions about learnings. 

All the best, 

Chris Cavert, Ed.D. 
0 Comments

Bullring Monkeys (Video)

2/12/2026

0 Comments

 
I learned this activity from my friend Chris Ortiz may years ago. Recently, I got to play it again during a workshop he led at ACCT. It’s one of those ‘simple’ but not easy tasks. Groups do not travel so they don’t need a lot of room. And it’s a nice ‘tabletop’ activity when working with participants seated at Rounds.

Here’s what I like about it:
  • Barrel of Monkeys! Who doesn’t get excited about hooking those monkeys?! So, there's good energy throughout the experience. 
  • Each person has some autonomy through their string – how much will they use it.
  • This can be a small group (e.g., 3 people) or larger group (e.g., five groups of 8 people) activity. 
  • Leadership behaviors emerge as the group navigates what monkey to go for and how to position themselves to get that monkey. 
  • There are opportunities for goal setting – both process-oriented and product-oriented. And does the group set goals? What are the benefits? Drawbacks?  
  • Success and failure are obvious – losing monkeys (progress) helps to refocus on the task.
  • Communication behaviors surface. How do group members talk to each other? Are ideas suggested? Forced? Held back?
Picture
I like Chris’s micro ring apparatus. It’s made with (what I’m guessing is) a small brass ring about 1-inch in diameter. (Any traditional Bullring apparatus will work for this activity. See this FUNdoing Post with video, to learn how to make your own Bullring.) He used cotton string about an 1/8-inch in diameter – it has a good feel to it – with an overhand knot tied at the ends. Each string is about 8-feet long and then girthed to the ring, making eight 4-foot strands to hold. Group size can range from 3 to 8 people. 

Leading Bullring Monkeys

There are a variety of ways to lead this activity depending on group outcomes. Chris’s workshop was about exploring some of the different ways a facilitator might influence a group’s experience. After using Bullring Monkeys we discussed, with Chris, some facilitator impact. (Maybe I can get Chris to share more about his work and pass it on to you. I’ll keep you posted.)

Here’s what we were instructed to do:
  • Each person in a group is invited to hold the end of one of the strings of the bullring apparatus at the knot. If there are extras, some people can hold two strings.
  • When the strings are pulled tight, hook one of the monkeys from your pile onto the ring of your apparatus.
  • When ready, pick up the monkeys.

We played for about 10-minutes before we stopped to discuss facilitator influences.
Prop Notes: 'Barrel of Monkeys' is easy to find in the States. Typically, there are 12 Monkeys in the Barrel (from Hasbro). I like to give each group a big pile of 16 to 20 monkeys, it just looks better.

I've seen creative configurations with paper clips that can be linked up. And I've used 'Chain Repair Lap Links' (below) with a bullring. When linked together, the strand can get very heavy! A great discussion point about what happens when we 'pick up' too many things and how we manage them. 
Picture
Picture
Have fun out there! Why Not?!

Chris Cavert, Ed.D. 
0 Comments

House Puzzle of String (a Paired Activity) with Video

8/19/2025

0 Comments

 
[NOTE from Chris: Before you watch the video, if you want to participate in a little 'Thought Experiment' check out my invitation below.]  

Several months ago, I started purposefully collecting and documenting problem-solving activities for pairs. I like using concentric circles* with groups giving all pairs icebreaker questions to answer. Then, moving one circle "to the left" three people forms new pairs quickly. Now, instead of just using icebreaker questions, why not throw some fun problem-solving into the mix where two people work together on a task? Mixing it up makes for good engagement and a bit more complex interaction.

*Concentric Circles – an 'outside' circle of people facing towards the center of the circle and another 'inside' circle with each person facing someone from the outside circle. 

A couple weeks ago in the FUNdoing Fridays email I shared a quick idea I had for a paired activity calling it the House Puzzle of String. Sam Sikes, in his 1995 book, Feeding the Zircon Gorilla and Other Team Building Activities, calls it The House – he uses a long activity rope. Here's a little snapshot of history:
Picture
Sam's Instructions (brevity brilliance): "Ask the group to pick up the rope." [An untied 40- to 50-foot rope for up to 12 participants lying in a pile on the ground.] "Tell them they can slide their hands along the rope, but they can't let go and/or trade places in line. Their task is to form a house or an envelope, whichever they prefer, without the rope doubling back on itself. You may need to provide a sketch of the end product for them to see." [I love the reference of the 'envelope.' I wonder if that's a recognizable image now.]
Picture
Picture
The image on the left would be the 'sketch' of the end product. So the group, everyone holding onto the rope, is challenged to form the house puzzle like the solution in the picture above. (After the group in the picture above solved the puzzle, they set it on the ground.)

House Puzzle of String
The image above on the right is the one I created for the House Puzzle of String paired challenge (the full size PDF download is below). The eight pathways in the house I call 'channels'. Using a 48-inch (122 cm) piece of string (or yarn), two people work together to lay out the string inside the channels without the string 'doubling back' on itself. The additional challenge is that the string cannot cross over any of the channel lines.

Video Note: I edited the video down to a about 8.5 minutes. It took my friend Dillon and I a little over 12 minutes to complete the task. (A majority of the time was spent getting the string within the channel lines – moving one part of the string often displaced another part of the string. Run with that metaphor!) 
housepuzzle_diagram_cavert.pdf
File Size: 8 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
Thought Experiment: Here's an email from a FUN follower friend of ours. After reading about House Puzzle of String he inquired: 
Tell me please, why do you need a pair to do it with the string? Can you do this alone?
The Experiment: Watch the video and then speculate how I responded to our friend. After a bit more contemplative prose I'll share my response (just a little trivia and a way to hide my response for now).

The House Puzzle is a 'Transum' or 'Path Puzzle' (Dillon discovered this.) Here's an image I swiped from the results of searching 'Transum'. Solve all the shapes (tracing over all the lines and dots) without taking your pen off the paper or doubling any line. 
Picture
One Answer for the House Puzzle of String: 
Picture
What have you speculated? Why would I program this activity for two people? Here's my response: 
Yes, this one can be done solo. However, I'm anticipating the interaction between two people doing this task will be noteworthy – open up some good learning conversations. 

And another Yes. Many tasks are much 'easier' (in some ways) doing them alone – "I'll just do it myself." With this mindset we are losing the practice (and benefits) of working with others....I like to use partner activities for some low risk people practice. 
If you considered another reason for using this activity with pairs, I'd love to know! And, what other solo activities can we turn into a paired experience? Leave us a Comment below. 

People Practice Questions to Ask
  • What parts of the challenge were difficult? What parts of the challenge were easy? 
  • Raise your hand if you could have done this challenge on your own. What changes in a task like this when you are working with someone else?
  • What are some of the things you do and say when you're working well with someone else? 
  • What benefits do you get from knowing how to work with others in a productive way?  


Keep me posted!

​Chris Cavert, Ed.D. 
0 Comments

Tools for Team Builders: Making a Hole Tarp (video)

4/27/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
I learned the Hole Tarp activity from my friend Tom Heck, probably about 10 years ago. In the last three weeks I saw the Hole Tarp several times during some of my activity hunting boughts (and then realized I never got this one to the FUNdoing Blog). So it's still alive and well. HERE'S a retro video from Tom. In his video you'll see some white tape near each hole. His challenge for the group was to get them to roll the tennis ball across each piece of tape without the ball falling off the tarp. 

As you'll see in the video (below), I use lines of different lengths to cross. I have also developed a nice progression with the Hole Tarp (below) to account for the skills and abilities of each group in play. Each Hole Tarp can accommodate 6 to 8 participants. When you have more than 8 people in your group, be sure to have more Hole Tarps on hand. Each group is then free to work their way through the different challenge levels at their own pace. I like to see how many Levels each group can make it through in 15 minutes. (I hope to have a video of some groups in action soon.) 

Here is a quick summary of the challenge Levels:
  • Main Rule: The ball many not be touched while it's on the tarp.
  • Level 1: Cross as many lines as possible before the ball falls off the tarp. When all five lines are crossed, move to the next Level. 
  • Level 2: Circumnavigate each hole. This means, the ball must travel around each hole crossing the hole's line twice. When all five lines have been crossed, move to the next Level.
  • Level 3: Circumnavigate each hole ON BOTH SIDES of the tarp. After going around all five holes on side one, get the ball to side two, without touching it, and go around all side two holes. 
  • Level 4: Circumnavigate as many holes as possible. Go around the five holes on side one. Get the ball to side two and go around all five holes. Then, go back to side one and circle the five holes there. Then, back to side two, and so on. 

I'll do a full write up of other aspects of the Hole Tarp (like using two tennis balls) once I catch some groups in action. Until then, fill in the blanks as to what makes sense for the challenge Levels. 

And, you can reach out to me if you have questions.

Editorial Note: Shooting video by oneself is a bit tricky. Forgive the 'interesting' moments and absorb the intent. Thanks. 

Have fun out there!

Chris Cavert, Ed.D.  

P.S. A big thanks to Training Wheels for letting me film at the warehouse!
0 Comments

Aga Zumba Zumba - Action Song (Video)

10/24/2024

0 Comments

 
Picture
I'm back after an amazing journey in India. There is so much to 'unpack' (figuratively and literally). I thought this video would be a fun way to start sharing some of my learnings. 

My friend Agyat (salmon-colored shirt on the right) led an early-morning 'Play for Peace' session at the 2024 AEE Asia Pacific Regional Conference in Pune India. (Learn more about the amazing work of Play for Peace – "From conflict to compassion." – HERE and more about AEE Conferences HERE.)

When I use them, I include Action Songs at the beginning of a program as a way to frontload some of the experiences ahead. Here are some examples: 
  • In most cases, the Song will be a 'first-time' experience for everyone. They will be learning something new together. 
  • Mistakes will be made along the way. Then there will be an opportunity to practice to get better if we are motivated to do so. 
  • There is some safe social risk-taking, but most people are more focused on their own actions instead of noticing others. 
  • Not everyone will be good at everything right away, more work will need to be done. 
  • ​Spontaneous laughter and celebration occur even during something challenging. 
  • (And, I can program Songs for small and larger groups.)

After a Song, we'll briefly explore some of the concepts (practice) and behaviors (laughter) they experienced during the Song. It's a simple thought-provoking exercise to prepare them for what's ahead. 

Please let us know if you have a visual source for other Action Songs so we can build our collection together. Leave a trail for us in the Comment. Thank you!!

All the best, 

Chris Cavert, Ed.D. 
0 Comments

Tarp Tossing (3 Challenges)

7/7/2023

7 Comments

 
Tossing stuff with tarps, sheets and towels has been a fun team building activity for a long time. (My favorite memory: Karl Rohnke getting a group to tarp toss over 100 corks in the air - check out Raining Corks.)

I finally got some video of my go-to Tarp Tossing sequence. It's part of a 2-hour curriculum I wrote focusing on cooperation. (Cooperation processing ideas below.) 

Needs & Numbers: I use 6 by 8-foot medium duty plastic tarps - a good price range and they hold up well. If you can afford it, get the heavy duty plastic tarps or canvas drop cloths. (SAFETY WARNING: Be careful around the metal grommets found on most plastic tarps - don't let fingers get into the holes. I like to roll/fold up the edges a couple times [2 rolls only] to cover the grommets - this also provides for a better grip on the tarp.) 

You'll also need a safe tossable object. I use a slightly deflated playground-type ball (those dollar store inflatable ones work well). I deflate them enough so if the catch is missed the ball does not go (roll or bounce) very far from the group.

Tossing works well with 4 to 8 players per tarp, middle school ages and older. (NOTE: When I worked with elementary ages the parachute was my go-to prop for tossing stuff together.) 

Challenges
Here are the three Phases/Challenges I like to present (and if you are near basketball hoops, there is another challenge):  

Phase 1: Toss Up - Each group/tarp in play is challenged to toss up their object approximately ten feet into the air and then catch it in their tarp. You (the facilitator) can be the judge of height or hold each group accountable for 'height validation' - was it high enough or not? After some practice, try the 2-minute challenge: How many catches can each group get in the two minutes? (Maybe, each group sets a goal prior to the attempt. How about a second attempt to improve on the score?) BONUS Challenge: If you have a basketball court at your disposal, try to 'Toss Up' into the basket. 

Phase 2: This challenge needs at least two tarp groups. Start out with one tossable for every two groups. After getting practice with 'Toss Up' (above), the two groups will toss back-and-forth to each other. The tossable must go at least 10-feet high, ultimately being caught by the tarp group that did not toss the tossable. After some problem solving and practice, try the 2-minute challenge: How many catches in two minutes? (Maybe a second round after some first-round problem solving to improve the score.) NOTE: If you need to form a group of three, position the tarp groups in a triangle formation. BONUS Challenge: Give each tarp group a tossable and challenge pairs (or a group of three) to toss and catch simultaneously. 

Phase 3: When there is time (and still some Tarp Tossing energy), present this single group challenge. Tarp groups are tasked to 1) toss up their object, 2) turn their tarp over 180 degrees, and 3) catch their object in their tarp. This challenge takes a bit more time to work out the 'problems' that arise and get "on the same page." The 2-minute challenge for this one: How many catches 'in a row' can be made? That's, toss-turn-catch. 

During this third Phase, I have the groups discuss, plan and practice for a while in order to build competencies. Then, we take some time for each group to share how they are approaching the challenge - one tarp group at a time shows everyone else. Then, groups get back to practicing. This part is brought up later in the processing session to see if groups had any influence on another group's process. What is the 'best' way? Is there a best way? What factors influence the best way? Who won?

After a bit more practice we move into the 2-minute challenge - catches in a row. Again, I always like to provide a process improvement opportunity after the first attempt.  
Processing Tarp Tossing focusing on Cooperation

This is the first question I like to ask: 
  • How do you all define cooperation? 

We put everyone's ideas together to form the group's understanding of cooperation. (Basically, cooperating to define cooperation.) 

As an example, I asked ChatGPT (AI) to provide "a short definition of cooperation." 

Response: 

Cooperation refers to the act of individuals, groups, or entities working together towards a common goal or objective. It involves collaboration, mutual assistance, and joint efforts to achieve outcomes that benefit all participants involved. Cooperation often entails sharing resources, information, skills, or responsibilities to maximize efficiency and effectiveness. It is characterized by the willingness to compromise, communicate, and coordinate actions for the greater good, fostering harmony and positive interdependence among participants.

Many of the concepts I've bolded above are brought up by group members forming their definition. I then pick a few of the concepts to explore depending on the overall outcomes the group is working towards: 
  • What did "working together" look and sound like for you in your group? What did you enjoy about working together with your group? How could you be better at working together? 
  • What 'common goals' did you work on together during the challenges? What goals were imposted by someone else and which ones were generated by you? Which goals did you reach or exceed? How do you feel about your successes and your failures to achieve the goals? What is difficult about setting goals? How do goals help us? 
  • Think back on how you 'communicated' with each other - what are your thoughts about the way your group communicated? What went well? What could be better? Share examples of the ways you would like others to communicate with you. What barriers prevent good communication? How can we eliminate these barriers? 
  • What is the 'greater good' for you all right now? What does this mean to you? Why is it important to you? 
  • What does 'positive interdependence' look like to you right now? What is important about this concept? 
Tarp Tossing is easy to set up, fun to experience and rich with take-aways. The cooperation focus is simply one direction you can take the discussion. 

Let us know where it takes you! 

All the best, 

Chris Cavert, Ed.D. 
7 Comments

Stepping Words (Stepping Stones Variation)

6/8/2023

0 Comments

 
(About a 5-minute read and a 3-minute video.) 
(Important Note from Chris: I really wanted to get this idea out into the wild so we can experiment and refine the rules - so lets develop it together. Please leave your ideas in the Comments. Thanks!)
Here's a little twist on the classic, Stepping Stones (Karl Rohnke, The Bottomless Bag 1991 and then in Quicksilver 1995). Below is the first (1991) write-up from Karl (exactly as written - only 1/3 of a page):   

Divide your group into smaller groups of five. Each group is given 4 rubber (plastic) gym markers and asked to physically cross the width of a basketball court as quickly (timed) as possible. Allow 2-3 minutes of planning time before the start. 

Rules (1991):
  • Only the markers can be stepped on. 
  • No one may touch the gym spots with their heels - ball of the foot only. 
  • If someone inadvertently touches the floor, he/she must also return to the start, and anyone touching them must also return. 
Considerations: 
  • Try to emphasize efficiency and group cooperation in your debriefing. 
  • Try different combinations of gym sports and group sizes. 
[A very physically demanding challenge when the floor cannot be touched by the heel.]

​In 1995, Karl noted, "This seemingly simple activity is fast becoming one of my favorites." In this updated description of Stepping Stones he included some choices for "Stuff You'll Need" like 12-inch square "rug pads" [carpet squares], "rubber deck spots" (from the Project Adventure Store), or "(12) 18-inch lengths of 4-inch by 4-inch lumber." Here's a picture from Quicksilver using the 4 by 4s [today, some consider the 4 by 4s too risky - 'rolling' potential]: 
Picture
Rules (1995): 
  • Anyone touching the ground between the boundaries must return to the start. 
  • Stepping stones must be touched at all times while in-between the boundaries - if a stepping stone is untouched "even for an instant" it is removed from play. 
  • Stepping stones may only move in the forward direction [eliminating the "rescue" of players required to return to the beginning after a touch]. Or, use this Rule: Stepping stones can only completely cross the boundary area one time. 
  • Boundaries: "Generally, it makes sense to set the boundaries far enough apart so that the group will need to recycle some of their props in order to cross the gap." 

[There is a full page description in Quicksilver of Karl's "fun way" to frame Stepping Stones using intergalactic travel starting from planet "Lrak-Dna-Evets" (a little word play here you might recognize if you've followed Karl's work).]
Stepping Words

I used Stepping Stones a lot over the years. My go-to prop was 12-inch long 2-inch by 6-inch boards - starting out with one board per person. As boards were lost (untouched), the challenge for the group increased. It is a good, easy-to-lead challenge. [NOTE: We can put letters on these boards as well, but we might need some other Rules?] 

Recently I was asked to make some larger Stepping Stones to make it a little easier for some of our camper groups to accomplish the task (the 4 by 4s we have can limit success). Once we cut the 16-inch by 16-inch by 1/2-inch particle board, I took some time to think about adding another (less physical) 'problem' to solve as a variation. The 'board tiles' got me to think 'word tiles' and Stepping Words emerged. Here is the original set of 12 board-tiles: 
Picture
After some figuring, these 12 letters can get us 17 letters. The 'I' can be a lower case 'L'. The 'U' can be a 'C' and a lower case 'n'. The 'W' can be an 'M'. and the 'P' can be a lower case 'd' (when thinking 'out-of-the-box' as we like to encourage). 

​I stenciled the letters and then outlined them with a permanent marker to make them stand out a bit more. Then I had a colleague build us a tile-holder for easy storage. 
Picture
So, let's Play!

Rules (2023): 
I led Stepping Words during our recent camp staff training for the first time with two groups and here are the Rules we plan to use/try over the summer with our campers:
  • Boundary Area: 50-feet across from Start to Finish (we're using lengths of webbing as the banks of our Lava River).   
  • Spell words to move across the 'Lava River' (we have a "Prehistoric" Theme at camp this year - hence the Lava). 
  • Words can be 2 to 5 letters long. [We didn't limit length at first and it was too easy to cross using longer words - not enough interaction.]
  • Words must be placed alternating between "UP" and "CROSS" directions - UP words go towards the Finish line and CROSS words go parallel to the finish line. 
  • As letters are placed, they must be stepped on to keep from floating away (being taken away). We will give our campers a '1-second' grace period to step on a board-tile. 
  • If a player places a board-tile they are 'bound' to this tile. Example: If I place the 'W' tile, I am now responsible for the 'W' - I keep possession of this tile throughout the journey. [NOTE: I'm not sure how this Rule will play out - we're going to try it.] 
  • Players can be bound to two tiles as long as they are touching them in some way.  
  • Once a word is in place - fully spelled - and players are stepping on all letters, the word can be disassembled so letters can be used in other words during travel. 
  • No jumping from tile to tile - one foot on a tile at all times between the boundary lines.
  • If a player touches the Lava (ground) they must return to the Starting shore for 'first aide' before beginning again. Remember: Returning players can only enter the boundary area onto a word of 2 to 5 letters. 
Ready? Go! 

Let us know what you think. One of my goals for this version of Stepping Stone is to make it more interactive. Let's see how it works. 

All the best, 

Chris Cavert, Ed.D. 
0 Comments

Team Tower Turning (with Videos)

3/26/2023

4 Comments

 
(About a 10 minute read.)
A friend and fellow team builder, Linda Williams, recently showed me her version of Team Waterwheel (from the book, Cup It Up: Team Building with Cups which Linda edited). She adapted Waterwheel for a training with over 300 people. Her design purpose was to work on the concepts of 'planning' and 'task implementation' with participants from a world-wide organization. I've used it now over a dozen times and I really like the versatility and outcomes. 

Linda provides a set of directions (PDF download below) for each Tower Turning team that includes general info and some goal setting (Tower Height Goal and a Building Quality goal - which is the number of 'collapses' the team will allow themselves along the way), and Team Tower Build Operational Procedures. There is also a Team Tower Turning Reflection Questions handout for you - a variety of questions to choose from to bring out the learnings from the experience (these Reflection Questions could also be given to each group to work through on their own during the designated reflection time). 
Team Tower Turning Participant-Directed Handout
teamtowerturning_2023.pdf
File Size: 81 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
Large Group Facilitation: When Linda worked with the group of 300, the participants were seating at round tables. All the building supplies and instructional handouts were preset at each table. During her introduction to the activity she used slides to emphasize the main points (some of her slides at the right) - one of the slides had an embedded video of the 'turning' process. My largest 'turning' group so far has been 72. I didn't use technology, just verbalized the instructions and showed them an example of how to start and how the turn is done. 
Picture
Here are the basics of the activity to supplement the handout: 
​
Needs & Numbers: You'll need 12 plastic cups and 15 - 4 by 6 inch index cards for each group of four to six participants. 

Time: This one can take up to 40 minutes depending on the amount of time available for the reflection phase. Breakdown: 5 min. to introduce, 10 min. of 'required' planning time to read through the 'Operational Procedures' and set Goals, 12 min. of building time, and at least 10 (to 20) min. of reflection time. 

Note to Facilitator: It is important to include enough time to debrief the activity with your participants. See the sample Reflection Questions in the handout to consider including in your after-activity discussion. Feel free to modify or add questions that will best suit your participants and the desired outcomes of your session.

Group Reflection: Read through the Reflection Questions in the handout to see the learning possibilities in the activity. 

Why I Like Tower Turning: 
  • ​Easy to find and use props (and there is so much more you can do with CUPS!)
  • Self-Directed instructions provide more decision-making and problem-solving for a group.
  • There is a clear picture of success and failure - when the tower falls, the group has the opportunity to identify and then solve the falling problems. 
  • It can be scaled to almost any size group (if you have the cups and a way to project your voice).
  • When I want to go deeper, I have groups take about 5 to 10 minutes to identify the attributes of a good working team and write these findings on the index cards (you'll need some markers). And then we can use this attribute 'data' to consolidate a take-away list of behaviors the whole group wants to focus on after their team building program. 

​Let us know how this one goes for you! Leave a Comment below. 

All the best, 

Chris Cavert, Ed.D. 
P.S. Tools for Team Builders Bonus Video: Tube Turning
4 Comments

Snowball Pick-N-Choose (with Video)

3/2/2023

0 Comments

 
(About a 7-minute read.)
'Pick and Choose' was one of my go-to's when I was getting started in the adventure education world. I first discovered it in the 1984 edition of Silver Bullets, by Karl Rohnke (it was the first 'Adventure Games' book I encountered in 1990). Over the years it solidified in one of my mental models that we always use buckets and tennis balls (cause that's how I learned it). Here is the Silver Bullets picture that's imprinted in my mind:
Picture
To make a relatively long story short (and you know I love long stories), I ran into a variation of Pick and Choose involving marbles and tape. I made the jump to 'paper snowballs' after an 'Ask' podcast I did with Michelle Cummings (Episode 57: Team Building with Paper) and a new mental model was born - Snowball Pick-N-Choose.  
Snowball Pick-N-Choose

Set Up: The picture below is the set up in the video (above). This is a good configuration for a group of up to 10 players. IMPORTANT NOTE: I used a combination of targets - hula hoops and masking tape - in order to demonstrate options. If I'm traveling light and playing inside, I'll just bring paper, masking tape, and an activity rope. The hoops are great if you have them on site or if you're okay traveling with them. 
Picture
If you have a larger group of 11 to 14 players, add another Snowball receptacle behind the line and more Snowballs - about 3 Snowballs for every player in the group (e.g., 12 players 36 Snowballs divided between the two receptacles). Then your first target row will have four targets, the second row will have three targets and the third row will have two targets.

Distancing: The first row of targets is about 8-feet from the throwing line, the second row is about 13-feet from the line, the third row is about 18-feet from the line. NOTE: Paper Snowballs do not go very far when thrown. An 18-foot distance to the highest points is doable, but not easy. 

​Scoring: You can choose any combination of scores for your targets. My first row is worth 15 points, my second row is 30 points, and the third row is 50 points (I want to make the farthest target(s) enticing). I put little point markers (index cards) at each distance but it's not necessary.  
Objective: Score as many points as possible in 90-seconds. (Karl's original version is 2-minutes, which can be a good cardio workout if needed.)

Play: 
  • The configuration of the equipment may not be changed. Only the Snowballs can be moved (by being thrown). 
  • A team will require at least two roles to be covered during play - Throwers and Retrievers. (Other roles can be created if needed.) 
  • Throwers must stay behind the throwing line and only the Snowballs (paper) can be thrown. 
  • ​Throwers can only take Snowballs from the receptacles behind the throwing line. 
  • There is no limit to the number of Throwers. 
  • Retrievers can move anywhere - near the targets and behind the throwing line - around the playing area to pick up Snowballs. 
  • Retrievers may not 'influence' Snowballs into the targets.
  • There is no limit to the number of Retrievers. 
Allow time for your group to plan and practice before each attempt. Be sure they understand and follow the rules. You can keep and call the time. And I like to record, in big numbers on flip chart paper, the scores of each round. Three or four rounds work well to notice some change in a groups process. 

Why I like This One
  • The rules are super-simple. 
  • To be successful a group must realize they need a lot more retrievers than throwers (but everyone wants to be a thrower to get points). How do they go about letting go of the glory for the good of the group or goal? 
  • Its high energy in short bursts. Does/Can everyone give their all in that short burst?
  • 'Problems' are easy to identify (there aren't that many) and solve - if people are willing to do the hard work (running around).
  • Hard work is involved. What else is hard work for people? What can be good about hard work? How do we want to handle hard work together? What's possible when we work on something together that is difficult? 

Wonderings
  • Will a group uncrumple the Snowballs (paper) and make paper airplanes to fly into the distant targets? 
  • Will a group uncrumple the Snowballs (paper), tear them in half and double their throwable Snowballs? Will a half-Snowball make it to the farthest target? 

Have fun out there my friend! 

Chris Cavert, Ed.D. 
0 Comments
<<Previous
    JOIN
    FUNdoing
    Fridays
    Team Building Activities sent to your email twice a month! 
    Picture
    FREE Reflection Activity just for signing up! 
    Picture
    Processing for Beginners
    FREE Mini-Course
    Click for Information
    Some Team Building Tools at the STORE! 
    Picture
    Details & Purchase
    Picture

    Details & Purchase
    Picture
    Details & Purchase

    Blog Author

    Dr. Chris Cavert is an internationally known author, speaker, and trainer in the area of adventure-based activity programming and its relation to community and pro-social behavior development.

    Blog Purpose

    This blog is a space for hands-on programable fun - energetic activities and ideas that can be used as a means to bring people together; activities and ideas we as educators can add to our social development curriculums. 

    Categories

    All
    Action Songs
    Activities
    A Files
    A-Files
    Challenge Course
    Chiji Cards
    CUP Activities
    Ed Tech 4 Adv Ed
    Facilitation
    Fun Props
    Large Group Activity
    Lessons
    Let's Talk About
    List Play
    Noodles
    No Props
    On Pedagogy
    Print N Play
    Processing
    Programming
    Puzzles
    Read This
    Repurposed
    Resources
    Small Group Activities
    Tools For Team Builders
    Top 10 Activities
    Variations
    Videos
    Virtual
    What? & Why?
    ZOOM Books

    Archives

    April 2026
    March 2026
    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly